AHDB Strategic Cereal Farm Midlands

AHDB Strategic Cereal Farms aim to putting cutting-edge research and innovation into practice on commerical farms. Each farm hosts field-scale demonstrations, with experiences shared with the wider farming community. Niab has partnered with AHDB to deliver the new Strategic Cereal Farm Midlands. Will Oliver hosts Strategic Cereal Farm Midlands. The farm is keen to invetsigate how to optimise inputs, whilst maintaining yield and improving rotational management.

Niab's Farming Systems and Pathology teams have collaborated to deliver three inital workpackages:

  1. Management of maize residue for establishment and disease risks of a following winter wheat crop in a direct drill system
  2. Optimising organic amendments in nutrient management planning for winter wheat
  3. Testing novel technologies to improve disease and nitrogen management in winter wheat (in collaboration with SporeSense, a technology company that uses AI biosensors to aid early disease detection)

Partners


 

Funders


Duration

2025-2031

More information on the project website

Image
AHDB Strategic Farm Midlands
Status

Testing the performance of biofungicides (winter wheat pilot trials)

Niab, in partnership with SRUC and ADAS, is delivering a two‑year AHDB‑funded pilot project to evaluate the performance of biofungicides against Septoria tritici in winter wheat.

As interest grows in biological alternatives to conventional fungicides, these trials provide independent, field‑scale evidence for levy payers on how biofungicides perform under commercial conditions and how they can complement existing programmes.

Trials are being run across three sites (Midlothian (SRUC), Herefordshire (ADAS) and Hampshire (Niab) using a single, standardised protocol followed by all partners. Each site includes two replicated trials: one trial using a septoria‑susceptible variety and one using a moderately resistant variety.

Seven biofungicides are being assessed, applied either alone or alongside a half‑rate fungicide programme to determine whether biologicals can enhance disease control or support reduced fungicide inputs. All products are foliar applied during the normal spray window, following manufacturer recommendations.
Initial findings will be shared at the AHDB Agronomy Conference in December 2026, with the full dataset available at the end of the project.

Partners


Funders


Duration

August 2025-December 2027

Latest news

Crop Production Magazine - March 2026: Theory To Field: Putting nature to the test

More information

Project website

Image
Septoria on crop leaves
Status

Refining the processes involved in recycling coir growing media

Title: Second Life: Development of sustainable recycled growing media
Funders: Overland Ltd, Growing Kent and Medway and The East Malling Trust
Term: April 2023 to March 2025

There has been a major shift in soft fruit production in the UK out of field soils and into soilless substrates, and with government policies aiming to reduce reliance upon peat, the majority of production is now in coconut coir. However, the increasing price of coir, limited availability and volatile shipping expenses have resulted in increased costs for growers. The carbon footprint associated with shipping substrate from Asia is also a concern, whilst additional labour costs are incurred in replacing and disposing of waste coir.

There has been much interest in re-using, composting or recycling coir although growers have so far been reluctant to use at scale due to concerns over pest, disease and weed build-up reducing both yields and the quality of the fruit produced. An early EU funded research project carried out by Niab identified that Junebearer strawberry can be replanted in used coir bags with little effect on yield as long as no disease was observed in the first year. Everbearers on the other hand suffer around 7% year on year yield decline when grown in reused coir bags.  

Overland has developed an automated process to recycle coir from strawberry bags which includes automated, low labour removal of bags from the tunnels, followed by the removal of plastic, plant leaves, roots and crowns, to leave clean coir. The coir is then treated to reduce the risk of pests and diseases, before making it available for growers.

Overland partnered with Niab to do further work to assess how the cycles of both growing and recycling change coir properties over time. We found that the water holding capacity increases while the air filled porosity (AFP) decreases in recycled compared to virgin coir. The extent of this change varied with different coir manufacturers. Recycled material also has slightly lower pH, higher electrical conductivity and higher nutrient content compared to virgin coir.  Levels of crown rot (Phytophthora cactorum) tend to increase in directly re-used and composted coir compared to virgin, but this has not been evident in the fully recycled coir that Overland is producing.

The project

Overland and Niab secured further funds from Growing Kent and Medway to accelerate this research and bring sustainable recycled coir media into commercial strawberry production. The aims of the project were to 1) develop energy efficient and robust procedures to eliminate pest, pathogen and weed risks in recycled material; 2) to demonstrate the use of recycled media on a commercial scale and develop wrap around agronomy advice; 3) compare lifecycle analysis of the virgin and recycled coir to measure any economic and environmental gains from using recycled media.  

Results

In work to eliminate pest, pathogen and weed risks from recycled coir, a heating process was developed and refined which successfully inactivated pest, pathogen and weed seeds from the substrate. Further work was done to study and compare the microbiome (community of microorganisms) within both virgin and recycled coir. We investigated fungal, bacterial and oomycete organisms in each coir type collected from a commercial scale trial during peak harvest.

A greater biodiversity of fungi was found in virgin coir compared to recycled and within these, we recorded more potential fungal pathogens on the roots of strawberry plants grown in virgin coir compared to recycled. These pathogens included species of Ilyonectria, Neopestalotiopsis, Verticillium, Mucor, Macrophomina and Fusarium. We also found more Colletotrichum and Penicillium species in virgin coir but not all of these are considered pathogenic. In assessing beneficial fungi, we found more Trichoderma (both commercial biocontrol species and others), Metharizhium and Serendipita in virgin coir. In contrast we found more Rhizophagus species (beneficial arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi) in recycled coir.

Bacteria were more diverse in recycled coir, but some were more prevalent in recycled and others in virgin coir. Potentially pathogenic groups were again found to be more abundant in virgin coir. 

Of the oomycetes (pathogens such as Pythium and Phytopthora species), very similar levels were recorded in virgin and recycled coir. There was a very slight increase in Phytophthora cactorum in recycled coir.

It is worth noting that no disease symptoms were observed on plants grown in virgin or recycled coir.

In work to demonstrate the use of recycled media on a commercial scale, the everbearer variety Katrina was planted in virgin Legro bags, directly reused Legro bags and Overland’s recycled Legro bags at a commercial site (Kelsey Farms) in 2023. Each coir type was used in nine commercial tunnels (over 3,000 bags per coir type) with an independent irrigation schedule. Sadly, during harvest the virgin and re-used coir were mistakenly picked and recorded together, so the recycled coir was compared to both virgin and directly replanted coir together.

The yields were similar (around 1.3 kg per plant) and no differences were found in pests (thrips, aphids, weevils), weeds or root rot pressure between coir types, but there were visual differences in plant growth. In the recycled coir, plants appeared to be stronger and cropped 7-10 days earlier than the virgin coir bags. The plants grown in recycled media also used 12 % less fertigation over the season. This reduction in water and fertiliser use in recycled material was especially prominent during hot days.

The grower was very happy with the performance of the recycled media, and has since expanded its use to over 200,000 pots of raspberry. A similar trial was repeated in 2024 at a Summer Berry Company site in Chichester, where 1.45 kg of fruit per plant (variety Favori) was produced in both recycled and virgin coir with 8% water and fertiliser saved in recycled media. The trial was done in troughs where roots could be inspected fortnightly. More uniform and higher density roots were observed in recycled material.

At Niab’s East Malling site in 2023, the everbearer variety Malling Supreme was planted in a small trial with both virgin and recycled Legro and Cocogreen coir in troughs rather than bags. Separate irrigation rigs were used for recycled and virgin media but not for each coir brand. The two recycled coir samples used 4% less water than virgin. Reduced need for wetting up and maintaining moisture in recycled material at the start of the season was the primary reason although reduced water use on the hot days due to the higher water holding capacity of the recycled coir also contributed.

The total yield from recycled coir was slightly lower comparing Legro recycled and virgin coir. This was due to the fact that virgin materials of both brands were fairly comparable in terms of water demand, but recycled materials with different previous growing histories were not. Namely, recycled Legro material had much higher water holding capacity compared to recycled Cocogreen. This meant that recycled Legro coir was over irrigated and recycled Cocogreen underirrigated resulting in a slight yield reduction. This highlights the need for the of use different irrigation/fertigation regimes with different coir types, or at least to use separate valves to manage coir moisture adequately.

In 2024, low grade, single crown, bare rooted Malling Centenary plants were planted in virgin and recycled material as a worst case scenario experiment. Yields were very low in both coir types (75-95 g per plant), but the plants yielded significantly more fruit in recycled material.

In an exercise to compare the carbon footprint of using recycled versus virgin coir, Niab and Overland calculated that removal-recycling-delivery of recycled coir emitted around 40% less CO2 than sourcing virgin coir shipped from Sri Lanka.

In summary, to date we have demonstrated that recycling coir offers much better potential than either re-using or composting coir. Recycled material can achieve strawberry yields and quality that is comparable to virgin material. Recycled coir poses no greater pest, disease or weed threat than virgin coir and there were fewer pathogenic fungi recorded in recycled coir compared to virgin, although there was a very slight increase in the oomycete P. cactorum in recycled coir. The rate and level of physical and chemical degradation does vary depending on the coir type, manufacturer and growing history but we believe that cost effective coir recycling is possible with little yield reduction.

However, it is important that the irrigation and fertigation of crops grown in recycled coir are managed separately from virgin coir, to adjust for the lower AFP in the recycled product, otherwise over-watering can occur leading to root death and reduced yield and quality.

Research project tags
Image
Recyling coir
Status

Developing new biocontrol for large raspberry aphid

Title: A phenology-perceptive integrated biocontrol programme for Large raspberry aphid (Amphorophora idaei) control: PHENCONTROL
Funder: Growing Kent & Medway and Innovate UK
Industry partners: Asplins PO, Biobest, Rumwood Green Farm
Term: May 2023 to May 2025
 

Control of aphids on raspberry was relatively simple in the past, with a wide selection of aphicides available to UK growers. However a progressive withdrawal of control products over the past decade or more has left raspberry growers with few effective options. Early season population increases of the large raspberry aphid have become particularly common in glasshouse and protected crops and despite relying on biological control options, levels of control have been inadequate, in part because their deployment has not aligned with seasonal variations in aphid populations and crop growth. Previous genetic resistance bred into raspberry varieties is also absent in modern cultivars. Improved forms of management and control are urgently needed.

The project

Niab aimed to develop an integrated biocontrol programme for raspberry that provides adequate protection against aphid herbivory and damage across all stages of aphid and raspberry phenology. We chose three routes to achieve this, firstly by trying to identify an optimal parasitoid species mix which will spread uniformly across the plantation. We also set out to  investigate novel ways of spreading Chrysoperla carnea (green lacewing) eggs across plantations to control hot-spot outbreaks of aphids whilst testing a strategy to deploy Micromus angulatus (brown lacewing) for predation of aphid eggs and spring hatching female aphids, when temperatures are still low.  

Results

In the early parasitoid work, the scientists worked with growers to monitor and identify the most prevalent naturally occurring parasitoids found in their crops over the course of the growing season. Between April and June, the parasitic wasp Aphidius ervi was most commonly recorded. Interestingly, other parasitoid species in the Aphidius genus, currently not in the parasitoid mixes were also found, especially later in the season. In later work when the Niab team assessed an integrated biological control approach, these Aphidius species appeared to dominate the total number of species identified. These findings will be used by industry partner Biobest when refining the mix of parasitoids they offer to their commercial customers.

In the work on Chrysoperla carnea (green lacewing), the strategy was to develop a method of applying eggs to areas of the crop where ‘hot-spots’ of large raspberry aphids are found. The challenge was to find a method of applying the eggs to the crop in a way that ensured that they would land and stick to the affected leaves. Different adjuvants carrying the eggs were compared to a water control. A highly diluted solution of food grade Xanthan gum provided the best suspension of the eggs in solution and level of adherence to the leaves and better than the other products tested and the water control. Importantly, the percentage rate of egg hatch on the raspberry leaves of eggs deployed in this manner was comparable to the control group proving that this method would not compromise biocontrol.

In the Micromus angulatus (brown lacewing) work, the hope was to find a way of controlling eggs and spring-hatching female aphids very early in the season before populations of large raspberry aphid began to rise. In this work the Niab team applied aphid eggs to a commercial crop of Malling Bella early in the season to establish early aphid colonies, then made weekly introductions of Micromus angulatus starting on 21st March. The aphid colonies were tagged before introductions began and monitored over the duration of the trial.

Concurrent assessments of both pests and predators were made. A reduction in aphid numbers began to take place by mid-April compared to the untreated control indicating that the brown lacewings were having a positive effect. The investigation also identified that Micromus angulatus will start to predate aphid eggs and adults at 12oC and above. The numbers of naturally occurring insects were monitored alongside the aphids and brown lacewings. This provided valuable insights into the pest and predator dynamics that occur in early spring-time.

Further work was carried out in the autumns of 2023 and 2024 where aphids and natural enemies in both the crop and neighbouring hedgerow habitats were sampled until leaf fall, with the intention of identifying species which might endure the winter seasons thereby offering an early level of control the following spring. Higher numbers of aphids were recorded in 2023 than in 2024, but numbers of lacewings and parasitoids were also higher in that year, suggesting that the predator and parasitoid numbers reflected the pest populations.

In a final piece of work, Niab linked up with Rumwood Green Farm to deploy and evaluate a fully integrated biological control (IBC) programme for the large raspberry aphid. The team recorded the release of commercially available aphid parasitoids and other biocontrol products and sampled crops for aphids at each chosen site on nine occasions during the spring and summer of 2024. Mixes of commercially available parasitoids were released fortnightly, while green lacewing eggs were applied to aphid hotspots at a release rate of 30-50 eggs per square metre.

Unfortunately, very low numbers of aphids were recorded in 2024 during this trial period, so the results were inconclusive and an additional season would be required to confirm any major findings. However, the growers involved in the work are of the view that despite an IBC programme being more expensive, they would expect that long-term establishment and persistence of parasitoids and other natural enemies should offer incremental yield and cost benefits to growers over successive seasons.

While further work would be valuable to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of these approaches in commercial raspberry production, this project has yielded important, actionable findings for growers, industry, and researchers alike. A key scientific outcome is the identification of parasitoid species present within raspberry plantations, offering potential to enhance control of the large raspberry aphid. This warrants further investigation, enabling Biobest to refine its commercial biological control products for raspberry growers. In addition, the project has developed a promising method for applying green lacewing eggs, which could reduce labour requirements.

Rather than relying on manual application to aphid ‘hot-spots’, prophylactic spraying of lacewing eggs may suffice; the eggs would adhere to raspberry foliage, hatch, and provide more uniform aphid control across the crop. Products using this methodology are already authorised in the USA, and were the UK to resolve the current regulatory barriers, such an approach would represent a valuable addition to the tools available for aphid management.

Finally, the finding that brown lacewings will prey on large raspberry aphid at temperatures as low as 12°C adds further value. This insight is particularly relevant for early-season aphid control and is likely to be of particular interest to organic growers. Together, these findings provide a practical foundation for improving aphid control in raspberry crops, with immediate relevance for growers and scope for future innovation.

Research project tags
Image
Large raspberry aphid
Status

Non-chemical control options for woolly apple aphid

Title: Novel approaches to pest and disease control in apples and pears
Funder: British Apples and Pears Ltd
Term: April 2023 to March 2024
Project leader: Michelle Fountain

British Apples and Pears Ltd funded Niab to investigate new approaches to controlling a range of pests and diseases. In 2023, we worked on apple canker and apple scab control whilst reviewing IPM techniques for codling moth and brown marmorated stink bug control. In addition, precision monitoring, semiochemical and biological manipulation was investigated to control pests such as apple blossom weevil, capsids and sawfly.

The final part of the work sought to develop natural control methods for woolly apple aphid (WAA), currently one of the most challenging pests for apple growers to manage. The pest used to be successfully controlled by broad-spectrum spray products, but the most effective of these have been withdrawn.

Batavia (spirotetramat) currently has an EAMU authorisation to control woolly apple aphid, but weather conditions and application timing are not always optimum for effective control. Rootstock resistance also used to contribute to control, but recent research by a Niab PhD study demonstrated that WAA has at least partially overcome such genetic resistance in some rootstocks. Alternative natural and biological control methods need to be assessed.

The project

Earwigs (Forficula auricularia) are important generalist predators in both apple and pear, of many pest species including aphids. In pear, previous Defra funded research demonstrated that earwigs contribute significantly to the predation of pear sucker. Wignests were developed in an Innovate UK project and offer shelter for earwigs, spiders, anthocorids and other predators, and where earwigs have been present in such wignests in apple orchards, a reduction in incidence of pest damage caused by codling moth and aphids has been recorded. The wignests are commercially available through Russell IPM. This project set about assessing if earwigs housed in wignests and deployed in apple trees hosting WAA, could reduce WAA colonies and colony size.

Results

Large numbers of earwigs were harvested from other habitats in May and June 2023, housed within wignests and then deployed in apple trees in three different WAA affected orchards. Plots both with and without wignests were compared for WAA numbers in July and August.

Overall, placing wignests containing 5 earwigs each in apple tree canopies did not significantly reduce the numbers of WAA in apple trees in one season. However, a trend was seen, especially on one of the sites, which demonstrated an overall reduction in the numbers of WAA on shoot leaf nodes, especially in the middle of the growing season (July and August) following the deployment of earwig loaded wignests at the end of June.

These results are encouraging, so it has been suggested that this work might be continued to examine the long-term impacts of relocating earwigs to apple orchards both to assess if earwigs return to the wignests in subsequent years, and also to test if re-inoculating the refuges with earwigs in a second year might reduce the WAA numbers further.

Further research might also seek to develop methods of harvesting and redeploying earwigs which are less reliant on labour. Additional research might address recent reports of fewer earwigs in orchards which might have been brought about by changing cultural practices such as less frequent mowing and the incorporation of cover crops. 
 

Research project tags
Image
Woolly Apple Aphid
Status

Developing a push-pull approach to SWD control

Title: Innovative push-pull control of spotted wing drosophila, an invasive pest of fruit crops
Funder: Innovate UK
Industry partners: Russell IPM, Rumwood Green Farm, University of Greenwich (NRI), WB Chambers
Term: April 2023 to March 2025
 

Previous research carried out by PhD student Christina Conroy as part of the CTP for Fruit Crop Research studentship scheme, identified a chemical repellent that causes a reduction in egg laying in strawberries up to six metres away from the sachet containing the repellent. Other research has demonstrated how precision monitoring traps can be used to reduce overwintering populations in habitats such as woodland adjacent to fruit crops in the winter.

The project

Working with industry partners, Niab set out to combine these findings into a push-pull approach to improve management and control of the pest. They set out to test the repellent compound in raspberry crops then carried out further trials in a commercial strawberry crop, combining the repellent inside the crop (to push the pest out of the crop), with a lure around the perimeter of the crop (to pull the pest away from the crop). Further work was done to optimise existing repellents and attractants for use by commercial growers.

Results

Disappointingly, in testing the repellent compound in 12m long mini-tunnels planted with raspberry, no clear reduction in SWD egg laying was recorded, despite increasing the dose of the compound.

In the push-pull experiment in a commercial strawberry crop over two years, no reduction in egg laying was recorded. Further testing was done using double the number of repellent dispensers, sampling fruit close to dispensers, deploying dispensers in the crop from planting onwards, and including Russell IPM’s commercially available MagiPal.

The MagiPal product, demonstrated to attract natural enemies into crops, was also shown by Christina Conroy in the laboratory to be repellent to SWD. However, despite making these adjustments, no further egg reductions were observed. These results were disappointing and demonstrate how difficult it is to control SWD in a commercial setting even though laboratory and small field tests can initially look promising. It is likely that other factors in commercial crops prevent the repellent working. For example the size of the fields and how the fly perceives the cropping area through vision, detection of fruit and yeast volatiles, and climatic conditions.

In seeking to optimise attractants (the pull component), the Niab team had an idea of a component that might be blended into the liquid products developed by Russell IPM to improve attraction. Liquid baits were compared to standard commercially available liquid baits in field trials. Encouragingly, the newly developed Russell IPM blend was as attractive as the standard Gasser bait which is no longer available. This was an encouraging result, showing that a UK produced bait can be substituted for a bait produced overseas, thereby reducing transport costs and carbon footprint.

Niab is extremely grateful to the commercial growers who hosted this research, without whom the work would not have been possible.

Previous work by Niab has shown that practising winter precision monitoring year after year can help to reduce local numbers of SWD on farms over time and particularly in crops in the spring. Traps should be positioned in hedgerows and woodland, especially in areas of bramble, elder and ivy.

Research project tags
Image
Male Spotted Wing Drosophila
Status
Publications

csfbSMART

This research project has now finished. Work is continuing on the subject in other funded research.


csfbSMART – ‘Sharing Management and Agronomy Research Tools’ – aims to test management methods and tools for use against Cabbage Stem Flea Beetle on UK farms, with oilseed rape growers provided with information on how to implement and assess these management strategies over the next three years.

csfbSMART connects two research projects investigating CSFB control. ‘Reducing the impact of CSFB on OSR in the UK’ aims to improve understanding of the pest’s biology and investigate alternative management methods. It is led by ADAS and Harper Adams University and funded by AHDB and a consortium of industry organisations. The second, ‘CSFB: evaluating management of oilseed rape on-farm for maximum margins’, led by NIAB and funded by Defra, aims to test these management methods on a wider scale, encouraging growers to carry out their own trials and assess their effectiveness.

The area of winter oilseed rape in the UK has declined significantly as a result of the withdrawal of neonicotinoid seed dressings that controlled cabbage stem flea beetle in the crop. Without effect chemical control the pest has become increasingly problematic, often leading to complete crop failure. Its future management will be reliant on a range of agronomic approaches.

The first stage of csfbSMART involves current, past and future oilseed rape growers participating in on-farm monitoring and reporting on current agronomic programmes in combatting flea beetle.

The second stage will support on-farm trials of alternative management methods to implement robust evaluation of practices and monitoring approaches.  This will include supporting effective interaction and learning between researchers, farmers and industry partners, through conferences, webinars, open days and workshops, to develop recommended bundles of monitoring and management approaches that are both effective and practicable.

csfbSMART is a unique, one-off, opportunity to draw together everybody’s knowledge and experience in a coordinated and sustained effort. From 2021 to 2024, csfbSMART will collate, assess and share information freely between growers and researchers, learn from successes and failures and work with farmers and agronomists to select innovations for detailed assessment through on-farm evaluation and research investigation.

csfbSMART will roll out monitoring tools to build a national and seasonal picture of the pressures of cabbage stem flea beetle larvae and adults within oilseed rape crops and the wider farming environment. It will enable farmers and agronomists to develop their own tailored strategies, regularly updated and supported by the latest research, and share results to create more robust solutions.

News and resources

Results, reports and posters will be posted here when available. Check the @niabgroup twitter feed for the latest #csfbSMART news

2022 posters - three posters covering the lifecycle and management of cabbage stem flea beetle

2021 poster - Join the fight against cabbage stem flea beetle

Soil moisture video

Need to work out your soil moisture? For a simple method, check out our short how to video, complete with downloadable spreadsheet to help you work out your own soil moisture.

Stem larvae counting made easy

Meeting summarising findings from the national csfb Stem larval counts

Press releases

Arable industry joins together to fight cabbage stem flea beetle - press release (5/2/21)

The consortium

csfbSMART partners include AHDB, Niab, ADAS, Harper Adams University and Rothamsted Research. The taskforce also includes Agrovista, AICC, BASF, Bayer CropScience, Cotton Farm Consultancy Ltd, DSV, Elsoms, Frontier, Innovative Farmers, KWS UK, Limagrain, LS Plant Breeding, RAGT, Sentry Ltd, Syngenta, Tuckwell Farms, United Oilseeds and Yara. Funding is provided by AHDB and Defra.

Research project tags
Image
Cabbage stem flea beetle
People
Status
Subscribe to IPM